Tom Lane writes: > Well, we *do* have a syntax for specifying a new default (the same one > that worked pre-7.0 and does now again). I guess what you are proposing > is the rule "If conflicting default values are inherited from multiple > parents that each define the same column name, then an error is reported > unless the child table redeclares the column and specifies a new default > to override the inherited ones". This was the idea. If it's to complicated to do now, let's at least keep it in mind. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://yi.org/peter-e/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
- [HACKERS] Re: Changing the default value of an inherited ... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the default value of an i... Oliver Elphick
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the default value of ... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the default value of ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the default value of ... Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the default value... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the default v... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the defa... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the defa... Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the ... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the ... Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the ... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the ... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the ... Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the default v... Nathan Myers