> I saw three separate reports of successful builds on Linux 2.4.2 on x86 > (including mine), but it isn't listed here. It is listed in the comments in the real docs. At least one report was for an extensively patched 2.4.2, and I'm not sure of the true lineage of the others. I *could* remove the version info from the x86 listing, and mention both 2.2.x and 2.4.x in the comments. - Thomas ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Re: [HACKERS] Third call for platform testing (lin... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Third call for platform testing (lin... Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] Third call for platform testing Tatsuo Ishii
- [HACKERS] Final call for platform testing Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Final call for platform testing Dominic J. Eidson
- Re: [HACKERS] Final call for platform test... bpalmer
- [HACKERS] International characters and... Fredrik Hultkrantz
- Re: [HACKERS] Final call for platform ... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Final call for plat... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Final call for platform testing Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Final call for platform ... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Final call for platf... Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Final call for ... Vince Vielhaber
- [HACKERS] Re: Final call for plat... Thomas Lockhart
- [HACKERS] Re: Final call for platform test... Jeff Duffy
- Re: [HACKERS] Final call for platform testing Adriaan Joubert
- Re: [HACKERS] Final call for platform testing Cyril VELTER
- [HACKERS] Re: Final call for platform testing Pete Forman
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Final call for platform ... Martín Marqués