The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think we've got to remove that failing horology test before we wrap RC3.
> can we comment out the test for now, so that its still in there, but not
> tested? or is there absolutely non way that we can fix that in the long
> term?
Commenting it out was the only idea that I had. Maybe Thomas has a
better idea, though.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
- [HACKERS] All's quiet ... RC3 packaging ... The Hermit Hacker
- [HACKERS] logging is funny... Fouad Fezzi
- Re: [HACKERS] logging is funny... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] All's quiet ... RC3 packaging ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] All's quiet ... RC3 packaging ... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] All's quiet ... RC3 packaging... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] All's quiet ... RC3 packa... Mathijs Brands
- RE: [HACKERS] All's quiet ... RC3 packaging ... Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] All's quiet ... RC3 packaging ... The Hermit Hacker
- [HACKERS] Re: All's quiet ... RC3 packaging... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: All's quiet ... RC3 p... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: All's quiet ... RC3 p... Mart�n Marqu�s
- Re: [HACKERS] All's quiet ... RC3 packaging... Tom Lane
