> Excessively long values are currently silently truncated when they are
> inserted into char or varchar fields. This makes the entire notion of
> specifying a length limit for these types kind of useless, IMO. Needless
> to say, it's also not in compliance with SQL.
To quote Tom "paragraph and verse please" :-)
> How do people feel about changing this to raise an error in this
> situation?
Can't do.
> Does anybody rely on silent truncation?
Yes, iirc the only thing you are allowed to do is issue a warning,
but the truncation is allowed and must succeed.
(checked in Informix and Oracle)
The appropriate SQLSTATE is: "01004" String data, right truncation
note that class 01 is a "success with warning".
Andreas
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
