Re: [HACKERS] age() function documentation

[Thomas Lockhart]

> > <grumble>
> http://www.postgresql.org/mhonarc/pgsql-hackers/2001-02/msg00550.html

OK, so that narrows down the list of suspects ;)

Why do you have a problem with the age() function? It *does* behave
differently than date subtraction, as explicitly mentioned in the docs
(preserving years, etc etc). Would we like some additional clarification
in the docs perhaps? Seems to be preferable to dropping all mention,
especially since it is a useful function.

                   - Thomas

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]