Michael Ansley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sorry for my forgetfulness (and a search through geocrawler didn't turn up > anything useful), but what was the problem with something like NOWAIT? > e.g.: SELECT * FROM a FOR UPDATE NOWAIT; > where, if the required lock could not be obtained immediately, this > statement would raise an error. I have no objection to that ... it does not cover anything except FOR UPDATE, though, which is probably less general than some of the other folks want. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
- AW: [HACKERS] timeout on lock feature Zeugswetter Andreas SB
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] timeout on lock feature Bruce Momjian
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] timeout on lock feature Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: AW: timeout on lock feat... Henryk Szal
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] timeout on lock feature Tom Lane
- RE: AW: [HACKERS] timeout on lock feature Michael Ansley
- RE: AW: [HACKERS] timeout on lock feature Mikheev, Vadim
- AW: [HACKERS] timeout on lock feature Zeugswetter Andreas SB
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] timeout on lock feature Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] timeout on lock feature Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] timeout on lock featurey Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] timeout on lock feat... Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] timeout on lock... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] timeout on ... Nathan Myers
- RE: AW: [HACKERS] timeout on lock feature Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] timeout on lock feature Bruce Momjian