> > > Sorry you are seeing trouble. I missed seeing your traffic on the dsssl > > > list to which I am subscribed; which one are you using? > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > The mailing list you should be on is [EMAIL PROTECTED] > (see http://lists.oasis-open.org), which is more about docbook processing > and less about dsssl programming (since that won't help you). Ah, thanks for the tip. I've been on the dsssl list forever, and it *is* related to the toolset we are using. btw, I've poked a bit at the rtf generated for the reference pages, and have found that the rtf emits gratuitous "\keepn" flags (keep the paragraph with the *following* paragraph). If I use sed to change these to "\keep" flags (keep the paragraph itself together) then the pages look *much* better. Will experiment a bit more, but I'm on the road to an easier way to generate the reference pages. - Thomas ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: No printable 7.1 docs? Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: No printable 7.1 docs? Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: No printable 7.1 docs? Tatsuo Ishii
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: No printable 7.1 docs? Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: No printable 7.1 docs? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: No printable 7.1 docs? Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: No printable 7.1 docs? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: No printable 7.1 docs? Tatsuo Ishii
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: No printable 7.1 docs? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: No printable 7.1 docs? Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: No printable 7.1 docs? Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: No printable 7.1 docs? Tatsuo Ishii
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: No printable 7.1 docs? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: No printable 7.1 docs? Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: No printable 7.1 docs?y Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: No printable 7.1 docs? Tatsuo Ishii
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: No printable 7.1 docs?y Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: No printable 7.1 docs? Vince Vielhaber