On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 03:09:53PM -0300, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > Anyone thought of implementing this, similar to how sendmail does it? If > load > n, refuse connections? > ... > If nobody is working on something like this, does anyone but me feel that > it has merit to make use of? I'll play with it if so ... I agree that it would be useful. Even more useful would be soft load shedding, where once some load average level is exceeded the postmaster delays a bit (proportionately) before accepting a connection. Nathan Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
- [HACKERS] refusing connections based on load ... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections based on load ..... Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections based on loa... Jan Wieck
- [HACKERS] Re: refusing connections based on loa... August Zajonc
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections based on load ..... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections based on loa... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections based on... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections base... Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections base... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections base... Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections base... Neal Norwitz