> > Nothing serious, but I would like to apply a patch to allow IDENT > > strings (e.g. 'hour') to be accepted by the SQL92 EXTRACT() function. We > > accept those for date_part(), which is what EXTRACT() is translated to > > by the parser, and it seems to be a reasonable to the standard. > But why does that need to go into 7.1.1? Does not "need to". But it is non-invasive, extremely low risk, gets the behavior to match the docs, and gets it off my desk and into the main tree. - Thomas ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
- [HACKERS] v7.1.1 branched and released on Tuesday ... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1.1 branched and released on Tuesd... bpalmer
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1.1 branched and released on Tuesd... Jan Wieck
- [HACKERS] Re: v7.1.1 branched and released on Tuesd... Thomas Lockhart
- [HACKERS] Re: v7.1.1 branched and released on T... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: v7.1.1 branched and released ... Peter Eisentraut
- [HACKERS] Re: v7.1.1 branched and released ... Thomas Lockhart
- [HACKERS] Re: v7.1.1 branched and relea... Peter Eisentraut
- [HACKERS] Re: v7.1.1 branched and ... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: v7.1.1 branched and r... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: v7.1.1 branched ... Thomas Lockhart
- date conversion (was Re: [HACK... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: date convers... Thomas Lockhart
- [BUGS] Re: [HACKERS] Re: d... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: date con... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1.1 branched and released on Tuesd... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1.1 branched and released on T... Bruce Momjian