Tom Lane wrote: > Contrib was my first thought also --- but on second thought, the RPM > packaging support is hardly contrib-grade material. For a large > proportion of our users it's a critical part of the distribution. > So, if we are going to have it in the CVS tree at all, I'd vote for > putting it in the main tree. > Perhaps src/rpm-tools/ or some such name. Let's see where the rest of core and hackers weighs in.... -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
- Re: [HACKERS] Extrordinarily Poor P... Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- [HACKERS] Extrordinarily Poor ... Ryan Mahoney
- Re: [HACKERS] Packaging 7.1.1 Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [HACKERS] Packaging 7.1.1 Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Packaging 7.1.1 Karl DeBisschop
- Re: [HACKERS] Packaging 7.1.1 Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Packaging 7.1.1 Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Packaging 7.1.1 Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Packaging 7.1.1 Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Packaging 7.1.1 Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Packaging 7.1.1 Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Packaging 7.1.1 Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Packaging 7.... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Packaging 7.1.1 Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Packaging 7.1.1 Karl DeBisschop
- Re: [HACKERS] Packaging 7.1.1 Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Packaging 7.... Lamar Owen
- RE: [HACKERS] Packaging 7.1.1 Rachit Siamwalla
- Re: [HACKERS] Packaging 7.1.1 Lamar Owen
- RE: [HACKERS] Packaging 7.1.1 Rocco Altier