Sorry for top-posting -- challenged reader.
Perhaps a future addition as \L ?
This command doesn't seem to be used and could be documented as being subject
to permissions and slower.
I actually would find this useful, but there are other ways of getting it. But
having the option would be nice sometimes IMHO.
[I've been testing 8.3beta1 with no issues and have just installed the beta2
release, hence I've been lurking on this list. No errors other than
self-inflicted ones.]
Greg Williamson
Senior DBA
GlobeXplorer LLC, a DigitalGlobe company
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and
privileged information and must be protected in accordance with those
provisions. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
(My corporate masters made me say this.)
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Tom Lane
Sent: Wed 10/31/2007 5:44 PM
To: Andrew Dunstan
Cc: andy; PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] psql show dbsize?
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Perhaps both these considerations dictate providing another command or a
> special flavor of \l instead of just modifying it?
I've seen no argument made why \l should print this info at all.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
