On 11/2/07, Gokulakannan Somasundaram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If the proposal is implemented
> BEGIN
>
> savepoint s1;
>
> some DML operations
>
> get current inventory2 = select ...
>
> if current inventory2 is < fixed size
>     current inventory1 = select .. as of savepoint s1;
> END
>
> Do you see the difference?

Yes, a completely non-standard and somewhat unusual feature.  What I
don't see is why you're wasting time pushing this frankly obscure idea
for time-travel, "only within a transaction".  Why not just go all out
and suggest re-adding time-travel completely.

-- 
Jonah H. Harris, Sr. Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
EnterpriseDB Corporation                | fax: 732.331.1301
499 Thornall Street, 2nd Floor          | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Edison, NJ 08837                        | http://www.enterprisedb.com/

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

               http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

Reply via email to