On Sun, 2007-11-04 at 11:06 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> No, if it's intended for the log it should be LOG. Your other proposals
> are actually *less* likely to get to where the DBA could see them.
Good point. I suggested WARNING because that suggests that something is
awry, whereas LOG is used for routine log messages.
I've changed the messages from DEBUG2 to LOG in CVS HEAD -- I didn't
backport the change, but I can if anyone feels strongly about it.
-Neil
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
