On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 11:01:26AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > Magnus Hagander wrote: > >>From what I can see MinGW regression is somewhat slower than MSVC (and > >>even than Cygwin) on my buildfarm VM that runs all three, even though > >>the latter two are rate limited by MAX_CONNECTIONS. > >> > > > >Uh, you're saying MSVC and Cygwin somehow differ from MingW? > > > > > > > > I'm saying my buildfarm members differ from each other.
Ah. I thought you meant we had some builtin cap in the regression tests, which is what confused me. > In fact, on the last run of each, MinGW was by far the slowest and > Cygwin the fastest in the "make check" step. But there could be any > number of reasons for that, including extraneous activity on the VM host > that could have slowed the whole VM down. Yeah. It does surprise me a lot that cygwin should be fastest, really. > Anyway, comparing regression test speeds is probably not very productive. Agreed. //Magnus ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
