Bruce Momjian wrote: > Marko Kreen wrote: > > On 8/24/07, Manuel Sugawara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > If something is not going a work (or is going a work in a different > > > way) in some version after loading a shot form a previous one I think > > > it should be documented or some kind of backwards compatibility > > > mechanism should be provided. > > > > That's a valid complaint and I take the blame. > > > > The problem was that such "evolution" was not actually planned. > > So when I noticed the 8.2 commit, I did not think of the implications > > hard enough to realize the need for release note for it. > > > > Tom, how about putting a note about that into next 8.2 minor > > release notes? (8.3 too?) Something like "You need to refresh > > pgcrypto functions, because since rel 8.2 the code depends > > on functions being tagged STRICT." > > Seems 8.2.5 was released without this release notes mention, but we > haven't gotten any complaints about it so perhaps we don't need to add > anything. Huh, I see exactly that complaint above. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/5ZYLFMCVHXC "Estoy de acuerdo contigo en que la verdad absoluta no existe... El problema es que la mentira sà existe y tu estás mintiendo" (G. Lama) ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend