"Josh Berkus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> There are interval * double precision operators (both ways) but none for >> interval * numeric. Adding this would make sense since interval is now >> optionally stored as fixed-point internally. Any objections to adding this >> in 8.4? > > +1 > > I've been casting to Numeric anyway.
Shouldn't the cast be implicit anyways? What does having double precision operators buy us? Wouldn't it introduce ambiguities? -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Ask me about EnterpriseDB's 24x7 Postgres support! ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
