On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 08:01:02PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > Thoughts? Is there anything about this that might be unsafe? Should > QueryCancel be set after *any* failure of recv() or send(), or only > if certain errno codes are detected (and if so, which ones)? Stevens identifies some errno codes that are not significant; in particular, EINTR, EAGAIN, and EWOULDBLOCK. Of these, maybe only the first occurs on a blocking socket. Nathan Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
