On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 09:39 +0000, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > Simon Riggs wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 23:04 +0000, Gregory Stark wrote: > >> "Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >>> The pages might well be in cache, so the file location might well be > >>> irrelevant from an I/O perspective. Maybe. The nth page solution allows > >>> the FSM block to be easily located without any FSM index, so might well > >>> be faster. Separate files mean more space and more fsyncs too. But even > >>> so, I'm not sure either way. > >> I don't follow any of the logical leaps in this paragraph. > > > > I asked Heikki to explain why he felt the design should go a certain > > way, which he didn't do. That's the logical leap I'm worried about. > > Well, it's just intuition at this point.
And yours is usually very good, I would be the first to applaud. -- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
