Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 11:27 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> That would confuse people terribly, and it *would* endanger our ability >> to see what was happening, 254 times out of 255.
> That's my feeling too, just wanted to check it still made sense for > y'all. Just to clarify: I don't object to lowering "successfully archived" messages to DEBUG1, if the field consensus is that it's too chatty. What I didn't like was the idea of logging some events but not other identical events. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match