Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
>> [Also there is a comment saying "this is a bug" in autovacuum.c
>> Are we thinking to go production with that phrase in the code?]
> Yeah, well, it's only a comment ;-) The problem is that a worker can
> decide that a table needs to be vacuumed, if another worker has finished
> vacuuming it in the last 500 ms. I proposed a mechanism to close the
> hole but it was too much of a hassle.
> Maybe we could remove the comment for the final release? :-)
What, you think we should try to hide our shortcomings? There are
hundreds of XXX and FIXME comments in the sources.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
