-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:18:52 +0000
Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 10:08 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Agreed. I either initiated or assisted with most of those items; but
> that's not really my point, however because those were planned
> performance "features".
>
> My thinking was about how we handle the last minute attention to
> detail that ensures we have performance everywhere, not just on the
> main features.
Well that is certainly a valid point. Unfortunately that is also a lot
of work :). We would have to have some benchmark that actually
attributes itself to common real world load (even the very simple real
world load like was just fixed).
I would also be happy to put some resources behind this.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
- --
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHTGEoATb/zqfZUUQRAgk8AKCLNFPpkEqKF44PyXI9D7k5ynZDSgCfbNNm
5JcjMi1+ZxWX4CzQn4y0Bdk=
=hvTR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
