Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > >> - Heap-Only Tuples (HOT) accelerate space reuse for UPDATEs > >> change to > >> "Heap-Only Tuples (HOT) improve performance of frequent UPDATEs" > >> > > > > I used the original text because it tries to explain _how_ HOT improves > > performance. The item that has the descriptive text explains how the > > space reuse works. A generic "improve performance" doesn't seem like an > > improvement. > > > > > > > I still think this needs to be qualified either way. As it stands it's > quite misleading. Many update scenarios will not benefit one whit from > HOT updates.
Doesn't the detail description qualify it enought? The heading isn't suppose to have all the information or it would be unreadable. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
