-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:14:58 -0500 (EST)
Kris Jurka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> > 3. It was grunt work that should have been done with the original
> > patch that didn't get done. Stefan picked up the ball and ran with
> > it and produced something that will make our product more usable
> > for the end user.
>
> Then why not list Stefan as a contributor to the original feature
> rather than calling it out as a separate item?
*shrug* that is semantic to me. My point was the attribution :)
Joshua D. Drake
- --
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD4DBQFHXXmUATb/zqfZUUQRAlfmAKCYhSEKuarEchkxlJJMf3Z8SVtT9gCY2Hex
ufDRdcgXQqEcnnNYh3JiCg==
=Qr0T
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
