On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 10:48 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote: > Andrew, > > > The requirement was, anyway, that we be able to read old versions of > > "archived" rows. IIRC there was an implementation choice, whether we would > > _never_ allow such rows to be SET READ WRITE or whether they'd be > > immediately upgraded to the present format on SET READ WRITE. > > Well, in theory we need this capability for upgrade-in-place too. While that > project has kind of stalled for the moment, we'll pick it back up again soon.
Who was working on it? -- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
