"Jonah H. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Don't we have any similar usability cases in the system like this,
> where negatives are not allowed only for the sake of it being an
> insane setting?  I'm tired, but I thought we did.

Yeah, probably.  It's the kind of thing where the call is close enough
that it might be made differently by different people.

After thinking about it for a bit, the only downside I can think of is
that throwing an error might create an unexpected corner case for code
that computes a LIMIT value on-the-fly and might sometimes come up
with a slightly negative value.  But you could always do
        LIMIT greatest(whatever, 0)
so that seems like a weak argument.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Reply via email to