"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> On Dec 14, 2007 6:42 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> How do people feel about applying this to 8.3, rather than holding it? > >> I think it would have been better to apply before beta. We would have found >> out if users were going to complain about it. Perhaps we should do it for 8.4 >> instead > > Um ... what's your point? Are you suggesting we might've backed it out > if a bunch of people complained? Perhaps, but given that no one's even > noticed the detail before, it seems pretty unlikely there would have > been any complaints during beta.
I suppose that's what I'm saying. We've certainly been surprised before by user reaction. But if you think we wouldn't back it out in that case that kind of takes the wind out of that concern. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Ask me about EnterpriseDB's Slony Replication support! ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
