If you reduce your code you will have to leverage the bool data type. Why dont you provide a cast, I dont see an overhead in typbyval datatypes.
On Dec 25, 2007 9:10 PM, Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > i'm in the need to create a boolean datatype which returns an integer > > instead of the usual 't'/'f'. Before anyone starts to point me at > > casts: it's a lot overhead to cast some hundred occurances beside the > > source of trouble, if you forget one. > > > > > > > Do you really need a new datatype or just to change the output behaviour > of the inbuilt type? That should be quite easy to do in just a few lines > of code. > > cheers > > andrew > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster > --Imad ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
