Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
Well, you could write the trigger in C and it'd work for any table.
I think it could be as simple as a memcmp of the tuples' data areas,
since we now require padding bytes to be 0 ...

Something like this fragment?

  newtuple = trigdata->tg_newtuple;
  oldtuple = trigdata->tg_trigtuple;
  rettuple = newtuple;

  if (newtuple->t_len == oldtuple->t_len &&
      newtuple->t_data->t_hoff == oldtuple->t_data->t_hoff &&
      memcmp(GETSTRUCT(newtuple),GETSTRUCT(oldtuple),
             newtuple->t_len - newtuple->t_data->t_hoff) == 0)
    rettuple = NULL;

  return PointerGetDatum(rettuple);

Close, but I think you also need to take care to compare natts and
the null bitmaps (if any).  Might be worth comparing OIDs too, though
AFAIR there is no mechanism for substituting a different OID during
UPDATE.  Probably the easiest coding is to memcmp all the way from
offsetof(t_bits) to t_len, after comparing natts and the HASNULL and
HASOID flags.


How does this look?

   if (newtuple->t_len == oldtuple->t_len &&
       newtuple->t_data->t_hoff == oldtuple->t_data->t_hoff &&
       HeapTupleHeaderGetNatts(newtuple) == HeapTupleHeaderGetNatts(oldtuple) &&
       (newtuple->t_data->t_infomask & (HEAP_HASOID|HEAP_HASNULL)) == 
(oldtuple->t_data->t_infomask & (HEAP_HASOID|HEAP_HASNULL)) &&
       memcmp(newtuple->t_data + offsetof(HeapTupleHeaderData, t_bits),
              oldtuple->t_data + offsetof(HeapTupleHeaderData, t_bits)
              newtuple->t_len - offsetof(HeapTupleHeaderData, t_bits)) == 0)

     rettuple = NULL;

   return PointerGetDatum(rettuple);



cheers

andrew
Also, when did we first require padding bytes to be 0?

The 8.3 varvarlena patch is what requires it, but in practice
heap_formtuple has always started with a palloc0, so I think it would
work a long ways back.

                        regards, tom lane


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
      choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
      match

Reply via email to