On Jan 3, 2008 12:44 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Gokulakannan Somasundaram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I actually mean to say that DDLs can be declared as self-committing. > > Egad, an Oracle lover in our midst.
:). True, its an impact of working more with Oracle. I made the suggestion here, because it might reduce some if conditions. > > > Most of us think that roll-back-able DDL is one of the best features of > Postgres, and certainly one of our best selling points vis-a-vis Oracle. > Don't expect us to give it up. Can you please explain, any specific use-case where DDLs are necessary within a transaction? -- Thanks, Gokul.
