-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 17:33:53 +0100 "Holger Hoffstaette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 10:57:53 -0500, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > > > Note that you should almost never use VACUUM FULL unless you've > > really messed things up. I understand from the thread that you're > > just testing things out right now. But VACUUM FULL is not > > something you should _ever_ need in production, if you've set > > things up correctly. > > Then why does it exist? Is it a historical leftover? If it is > only needed for emergency, should it not have a different name? > Just curious.. There are times when it is required, usually when people don't configure normal vacuum/autovacuum correctly. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > Holger > > > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our > list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org > - -- The PostgreSQL Company: Since 1997, http://www.commandprompt.com/ Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate SELECT 'Training', 'Consulting' FROM vendor WHERE name = 'CMD' -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHgmEbATb/zqfZUUQRAoyXAJ9GB4lXGr6UsEMpdT4KDvtIkRv+ywCdEMQV T07KuT+OUWcrr9NEX+blSuQ= =rDNL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
