On 2008-01-07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The real question that Josh's report brings up to me is why the heck was > there an orphaned temp table? Especially if it was only a toast table > and not the linked "regular" temp table? Something happened there that > should not have.
The regular table was there too, but the regular table's relfrozenxid was apparently recent, only the toast table's was old: > pg_toast_49013869 | 2146491285 [...] > SELECT oid::regclass FROM pg_class WHERE > reltoastrelid='pg_toast.pg_toast_49013869'::regclass; > > oid | pg_temp_24.tmp_isp_blk_chk The regular table had not shown up on a query of age(relfrozenxid) WHERE relkind='r' but the toast table showed up on a similar query with WHERE relkind='t'. -- Andrew, Supernews http://www.supernews.com - individual and corporate NNTP services ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
