On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 11:57 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 19:23 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > >> [ blanches... ] Can you say "security hole"? > > > Static on the line, sorry. > > I'm hearing "useful superuser-only capability". ;-) > > It would be far *more* useful if it didn't have to be superuser-only. > And since the actual details of the snapshot content are really of > zero interest to the user, I think making it pass through his hands > is simply misdesign.
No, its deliberate, because I want this to work on prior releases. I didn't clearly explain that, sorry. For 8.4+ I will design the internal route for this feature. -- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
