"John Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Can someone clarify if WAL-logging of hash indexes will be supported > in the 8.4 release?
There is absolutely 0 value in tackling that until someone can fix hash's performance problems. If there is no real-world scenario for using it ... which there really isn't ... then adding WAL support still leaves you with no real-world scenario for using it. This is not to suggest that I wouldn't like to see all of that fixed; I would. But let's concentrate on the showstoppers first, rather than expending effort that might ultimately be a waste. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly