Dear all,
I have some questions about PostgreSQL's modularity.
We know that PostgreSQL is famous for its good modularity, which allows
users to select which part they need. It also allow developers to easily
replace one part without affecting other parts. However, as I know, most
database engine, like MySQL, has such modularity: layered architecture and
small pieces of functionalities. Actually, it's a rule recognized by lots of
software design. Why is only PostgreSQL entitled "good modularity"?
Best,
Hope
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
