"Greg Sabino Mullane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In summary: what would objections be to my writing a sha1() patch?
Mainly that no one else is dissatisfied with the current split between core and pgcrypto. The only reason md5() is in core is to support encryption of passwords in pg_shadow. There are good reasons not to have any more crypto capability in core than we absolutely have to; mainly to do with benighted laws in some countries. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend