Greg Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 20 Jan 2008, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think the main problem is the qualifying clause up front in a place
>> of prominence. Here's a V3 try
> That one looks good to me. These are small details but better to get it
> right now.
OK, committed. Back to Alvaro's original concern: is the short
description in guc.c all right, or can we improve that?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
