Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I suggest that the current code is more correct than you think ;-).
>> ISTM it is a good idea to require a units field, or at least some
>> punctuation giving a clue about units --- for example I do not object to
>> '08:00' being interpreted as hours and minutes. But I would be inclined
>> to reject all four of the forms '+8', '-8', '8.0', and '8' as ambiguous.
>> Is there something in the SQL spec that requires us to accept them?
> Single-field signed integers (and unsigned integers?) must be acceptable
> for a time zone specification (pretty sure this is covered in the SQL
> spec).
But surely there is other context cuing you that the number is a
timezone? In any case, you weren't proposing that interval_in
should accept '8' as a timezone ...
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
