Guillaume Smet wrote:
On Jan 27, 2008 9:07 PM, Markus Bertheau
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2008/1/28, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Do we have nominations for a name? The first idea that comes to
mind is "synchronized_scanning" (defaulting to ON).
"synchronized_sequential_scans" is a bit long, but contains the
keyword "sequential scans", which will ring a bell with many, more
so than "synchronized_scanning".
synchronize_seqscans?
How about enable_syncscan, or enable_seqscan_sync? It's not strictly
something the influences the planner, but maybe it's similar enough to
justify a similar naming?
regards, Florian Pflug
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match
