On Feb 14, 2008, at 10:06 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
=?UTF-8?B?UmFwaGHDq2wgSmFjcXVvdA==?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
so, I propose the use of
        NEW[variable_containing_the_column_name]
(which can obviously be extended to any tuples)
to allow such access.

what do you experts think ?

Zero chance.  plplgsql is a strongly typed language, and a construct
like that couldn't have any known-in-advance data type.

Would it be reasonable to teach EXECUTE about NEW and OLD? That should allow the OP to do what he's looking for...
--
Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to