On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 12:11:05PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Let's put PL/PgSQL in template1 by default, as some downstream > > packagers are already doing. If someone really must remove it, > > they can still do that. > > This has been proposed before, and rejected before. Have you got > any new arguments?
The longer it's been since the last vuln in PL/PgSQL, the harder it is to argue for having it not be there by default. Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
