On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 06:14:27PM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:42:02 -0500 > Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > All this discussion seems to me to be going off into the clouds, > > where every objection is met with some still more elaborate scheme. I > > think we need to look at simple, incremental, and if possible > > backwards compatible changes. > > The simplest solution I can think of is: > > Have a table pg_configuration (pg_settings?). > > Allow that table to be inserted into but not updated or deleted from.
<snip> This pretty much kills the ability for people who *want* to edit things from the config file only, right? I don't think that's acceptable. At least not if it's at all avoidable, which I think it is. //Magnus ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate