Mark Mielke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm noticing a massive reduction in on disk storage required for my 
> database that I believe is primarily attributable due to Tom's reduced 
> overhead for short strings.

Twasn't my work; Greg Stark gets most of the credit for that one, and
you might be seeing some benefit from Heikki's work to cut the tuple
header size too.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

               http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

Reply via email to