Mark Mielke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm noticing a massive reduction in on disk storage required for my
> database that I believe is primarily attributable due to Tom's reduced
> overhead for short strings.
Twasn't my work; Greg Stark gets most of the credit for that one, and
you might be seeing some benefit from Heikki's work to cut the tuple
header size too.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq