Mark Mielke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm noticing a massive reduction in on disk storage required for my > database that I believe is primarily attributable due to Tom's reduced > overhead for short strings.
Twasn't my work; Greg Stark gets most of the credit for that one, and you might be seeing some benefit from Heikki's work to cut the tuple header size too. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq