Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Am Dienstag, 26. Februar 2008 schrieb Tom Lane:
Why should it complain more or less than about the SUBSYS.o
files?
It has a hard-wired rule not to complain about files named *.o.
Well, we could name the output file SUBSYS.o if that is not too confusing. :)
Yeah, it probably is. D'Arcy's suggestion of modifying our
CVSROOT/cvsignore file seems better.
+1. Calling it something like foo.o when it isn't an object file would
be horrible. This should be a simple one-off operation.
cheers
andrew
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
