Tom Lane wrote:
The concern I've got about this is basically that it would encourage
plastering the same label on subtly different counts, leading to
confusion and perhaps mistaken conclusions. I would prefer to see any
common probes be reverse-engineered *after the fact*, ie, after you've
already instrumented several DB's you're in a better position to figure
out what's common and what's not. I distrust preconceived notions about
that.
Your point is well taken, and we can revisit this later!
Regards,
-Robert
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
