Hi -
I was perusing the todo list to see some easy items that I might help out on
(and get up to speed on postgres hacking)... one of them (with %) seems to lead
to another:
o %Have ALTER TABLE RENAME rename SERIAL sequence names
o Have ALTER SEQUENCE RENAME rename the sequence name stored in the
sequence table
and perhaps this one as well:
Consider placing all sequences in a single table, or create a system view
I read through the mailing list links (they seem to culminate with these two):
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2007-09/msg00141.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2007-10/msg00038.php
But I'm left a bit confused on what, if anything, can or should be done. Maybe
this isn't the best item to start with? If I had some more direction, it might
be straightforward enough.
One thing I did notice: sequence names are stored in both pg_type.typname and
pg_class.relkind. I presume both tables would need to be updated, unless we
remove the redundancy? Why can they not be updated within a single transaction
(easily)? What sort of restructuring would be needed to separate out the
transactional vs non-transactional aspects?
thanks!
--craig
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
--
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://mail.postgresql.org/mj/mj_wwwusr?domain=postgresql.org&extra=pgsql-hackers
