On Thu, 6 Mar 2008, Tom Lane wrote:
What about the other idea of just having committers wait for the next walwriter-cycle flush before reporting commit?
I haven't considered that too much yet; it may very well be superior to anything I was thinking of. The only point I was trying to make today is that I'd prefer not to see commit_delay excised until there's a superior replacement for it that's suitable even for synchronous write situations.
-- * Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
