Mark Mielke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ... I think the transaction overhead, and
> attempts to re-use PostgreSQL tables to implement LISTEN/NOTIFY to be
> clever but mis-guided.
Oh, I don't disagree with you. As I already mentioned, they desperately
need to be rewritten. However, given that that's not a sanely
back-patchable answer, we have to consider what are the appropriate
semantics for the existing infrastructure.
(Also, if they *were* memory-based then the question of their relation
to 2PC semantics becomes even more urgent.)
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
