Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> Hmm, AFAIR subsequent investigation led to the discovery that autovacuum >> is not affected by statement_timeout.
> Right -- see > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.general/80044/focus=93847 Or even more to the point, look into autovacuum.c: /* * Force statement_timeout to zero to avoid a timeout setting from * preventing regular maintenance from being executed. */ SetConfigOption("statement_timeout", "0", PGC_SUSET, PGC_S_OVERRIDE); > So your documentation changes are incorrect. Indeed. But wasn't the start of this thread a mention that pg_dump ought to have a similar defense? AFAIR it does not, so there's still a small TODO. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
