Magnus Hagander wrote: > > > > How about we move it to the wiki. AFAIK we can still lock it down to who > > > can edit it if we want to > > > > You should confirm you can get the editing granularity you want before > > making too many plans here if this is important. The features for locking > > down things in Mediawiki are very limited. > > > > The Wiki philosophy here is that you could revert quite a few bad changes > > in the time it would take you to lock it down so those bad changes could > > never happen in the first place. Last time I checked vandalism and bad > > edits were not a problem on the developer's wiki. > > It's not. And I personally don't think it would be a problem. > But I think it'll be a lot easier to sell to those who prefer > textfiles in cvs (hello bruce!) if we can.
I don't care who edits it myself, though I can say I get perhaps one patch a year to the TODO list file --- usually I just an email saying remove that item or something. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
