Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Or we could apply Peter's patch more or less as-is, but I don't like >> that. I don't think it solves the stated problem: if you know that CASE >> branches 3 and 5 don't match, that still doesn't help you in a monster >> query with lots of CASEs. I think we can and must do better.
> Do we have something more helpful than "branches 3 and 5"? That's exactly the point of discussion. A parser location is what we need, the problem is that this patch doesn't provide it. > Perhaps printing the actual transformed expressions? Don't think it solves the problem either. For instance, if there are a hundred references to variable X in your query, printing "X" isn't going to get you far. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers